Free brand analysis
The methods behind the analysisGuidesAnalysesActionsAssistantsMaterialExploiting competitors' weaknessesSectionsSource basis and methodology00Brand archetype01Tone-of-Voice02Brand values and purpose03Brand Identity Prism04Brand assets05Semiotic analysis06Distinctive assets07Positioning08Audience alignment09Employer brand10Narrative analysis11Digital and channel execution12Brand harmony13Brand index14
← All methods
← 091011 →

Section 10

Employer Brand Proposition

Tim Ambler & Simon Barrow, 1996

Ambler and Barrow introduced employer branding in Journal of Brand Management (1996) and described the EVP as the sum of what an organisation offers its employees: rationally, emotionally and culturally.

brandvju treats employer branding as a distinct brand layer – not merely internal communication or an HR task. The most important question is not whether the EVP is good, but whether it is consistent with the commercial brand. A brand that communicates innovation externally but uses generic language in job postings sends a split signal. brandvju specifically looks for tensions between commercial communication and recruitment communication.

What brandvju assesses

Rational EVP
Salary, benefits, career opportunities, development offers and flexibility.
Emotional EVP
Pride, belonging, meaningfulness and inspiration – engagement beyond the rational.
Cultural EVP
Values, behavioural norms and leadership style. The deepest layer that determines whether people stay.
Consistency with commercial brand
Does the brand tell the same fundamental story to customers and potential employees?

What the analysis is based on – and what it points towards

The analysis is based on job postings, careers pages and public communication. Employer brand is largely communicated on social media, which cannot be crawled; if you add those posts to the material archive, they are included. Actual employee experience, internal culture and retention data are not part of the brand analysis.

How to read the score – scale and business model

Read this score in light of your scale and business model. Some strengths require reach or volume that larger brands simply have more of – broad mental availability, a formalised employer brand, many channels. A low score here is not necessarily a weakness; it may reflect your size or model rather than a lack of effort. Your recommendations take this into account and only suggest what you can meaningfully move.