The average brand barely exists

Published Data snapshot: 351 brands as of 15 October 2026How we measuredDownload as PDF

Many businesses fear the same thing when they are measured: "we are probably just average." We have tested that fear on 351 Danish brands, discipline by discipline. It does not hold. The typical brand sits in the middle of the field in only about one in four of its sections, and nine in ten brands deviate markedly from the field in at least one place.

The myth of the middle

When we measure a brand on our 13 measured disciplines and compare it with the field, you might expect most to cluster in the middle. They do not. Only 36 of 351 brands sit in the middle of the field in half or more of their disciplines. The typical brand is not average. It is uneven: strong in some places, weak in others, and only rarely mostly in the middle.

And most important: 90 percent of all brands have at least one discipline in which they deviate markedly from the field, upwards or downwards. In other words, almost all of them have edges. Few know where those edges are.

No one is average everywhere Number of sections per brand in which the brand deviates markedly from the field: 36 deviate nowhere, 315 of 351 (90 percent) in at least one place. IN HOW MANY SECTIONS DOES A BRAND DEVIATE MARKEDLY? Number of brands by number of sections deviating markedly from the field median (n = 351) 36 0 57 1 69 2 40 3 21 4 128 5+ 0 50 100 Number of sections with marked deviation Only 36 brands deviate nowhere "Markedly" = more than one standard deviation from the field median. 315 of 351 brands (90 percent) deviate in at least one section. © brandvju. Source: brandvju benchmark, 351 brands as of 15 October 2026.

The edges are the strategy

That changes what a brand measurement is for. The task is not to discover WHETHER you stand out; almost everyone does, somewhere. The task is to find out WHERE, and whether the edges are in the right places: a marked strength in a discipline customers do not care about is wasted distinctiveness, and a marked weakness in a discipline the category competes on is an open flank.

The ten percent who actually sit mostly in the middle have, paradoxically, the hardest task: they must create an edge from nothing. Everyone else "merely" has to move their efforts to where the edges already are, or ought to be.

What this means for your brand

Do not ask "how do we do overall?" The average across 13 measured disciplines smooths out exactly what you need. Ask instead: where are our two or three marked deviations, and were they chosen or accidental? A strength you have chosen and tend is a position. A strength nobody has noticed is a coincidence that can vanish with the next reorganisation.

How we measured (method)

The figures are based on 351 brands analysed in brandvju as of October 2026, all measured with the same method. "The middle of the field" and "marked deviation" are defined from the field's own spread per discipline (the same band used in our reports), so that a deviation means the same in all disciplines.

A strong brand is one of a company's most important assets. It makes you recognisable, it carries your prices, and it works for you every time someone meets you. Even so, brand strategy has long been under-prioritised and often reserved for companies with large budgets and dedicated resources. We think that is wrong: everyone deserves a strong brand, and that is why brandvju exists.

Our analyses measure 15 disciplines and show where your brand sits relative to the field of analysed brands. Run a free analysis of your brand and see what would move most for you.

Run a free analysis